Wednesday, October 11, 2006
More recordings of nuclear blasts
From the Oklahoma Geological Survey:
A 700-1800 kiloton blast from 1992. The largest underground blast since 1976 according to that site. The station was 11420 km from the blast.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ccc55/ccc55b03b75db083dd4198de66764abc7eb5c801" alt=""
For comparison the 1995 M6.9 Kobe earthquake (10600 km from the station and 22 km deep). (note that this seismogram is ~1 hr long while the seismogram from the nuclear blast is only ~20 minutes long).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7339/b733975aa211517494175a2ab30fc876ae57f76d" alt=""
As I learned in the comments from thread at No Se Nada a sesimogram from a blast is dominated by P-waves. I can certainly see the lack of S waves in the recording from the nuclear blast (assuming they were cut from the plot).
Here's an explanation from LLNL:
Here's the figure referred to in that quote:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7f131/7f1314e86a76462e8025722aabbe334bed0929f4" alt=""
The LLNL page also has a good discussion of the difficulties in inferring blast yields from seismograms.
UPDATE: I forgot to give a link to the LLNL page.
UPDATE: Lab Lemming has a couplenice posts on this topic.
UPDATE: Posts about the North Korea nuclear test at WG:
Radioactive material detected from North Korea
Guestblog: Teachable Moment: North Korea nuclear test
More recordings of nuclear blasts
North Korea nuclear test
A 700-1800 kiloton blast from 1992. The largest underground blast since 1976 according to that site. The station was 11420 km from the blast.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ccc55/ccc55b03b75db083dd4198de66764abc7eb5c801" alt=""
For comparison the 1995 M6.9 Kobe earthquake (10600 km from the station and 22 km deep). (note that this seismogram is ~1 hr long while the seismogram from the nuclear blast is only ~20 minutes long).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7339/b733975aa211517494175a2ab30fc876ae57f76d" alt=""
As I learned in the comments from thread at No Se Nada a sesimogram from a blast is dominated by P-waves. I can certainly see the lack of S waves in the recording from the nuclear blast (assuming they were cut from the plot).
Here's an explanation from LLNL:
"Livermore seismologist Bill Walter explains that the differences in seismic P- and S-wave energy provide one method of discriminating explosions from earthquakes. Seismic P waves are compressional waves, similar to sound waves in the air. Shear (S) waves are transverse waves, like those that propagate along a rope when one end is shaken. Because underground explosions are spherically symmetric disturbances, they radiate seismic P waves efficiently. In contrast, earthquakes result from sliding or rupture along a buried fault surface and strongly excite the transverse motions of S waves. Thus, we expect that explosions will show strong P waves and weak S waves and that earthquakes will show weak P waves and strong S waves, as seen in Figure 2."
Here's the figure referred to in that quote:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7f131/7f1314e86a76462e8025722aabbe334bed0929f4" alt=""
The LLNL page also has a good discussion of the difficulties in inferring blast yields from seismograms.
UPDATE: I forgot to give a link to the LLNL page.
UPDATE: Lab Lemming has a couplenice posts on this topic.
UPDATE: Posts about the North Korea nuclear test at WG:
Radioactive material detected from North Korea
Guestblog: Teachable Moment: North Korea nuclear test
More recordings of nuclear blasts
North Korea nuclear test